Value Proposition Upsell

Date
February 2023
My Role
Lead Product Designer
Client
Smart Spaces
Project
E2E Journey
THE Opportunity

What I found

Business Problem

Smart Spaces differentiated themselves in market via their main value proposition which provided in-person installation and/or remote technical help via a subscription from the O-Team. However, data collected showed that the attachment rate for this service was only 2%.

Value prop before

How I fixed it

THE APPROACH

Hypothesis

Due to poorly designed value proposition customers were not seeing the value in paying for subscription based installation and were cognitively overloaded by all the options. Additionally the postcode checker was hypothesised to be a point of friction.

Measures of Success

My aim was to optimise the E2E journey in order to improve the customer experience and increase the service attachment rate from 2% to at least 3%.

STEP 1

Competitor Analysis & Content Audit

Value prop before

The first steps were to review and compare the current journey and value proposition to our competitors and in doing so we realised that it wasn’t only financially non-viable for customers but it wasn’t communicated effectively across the website. 

After speaking with the Product Team they agreed to offer bespoke prices for install which made more sense.

STEP 2

Data Analysis

I then analysed the data which revealed that our customers visited our Product Detail Page (PDP) the most and decided to start by focusing on that page.

STEP 3

Ideation

I began by proposing a solution to de-couple the in-person and subscription propositions so that in-person installation was the main focus and moved it out from an accordion for visibility.

Progressive disclosure idea
Another idea

Next I drew up some rough ideas and brainstormed some tactical vs more long term strategic solutions which included a geolocation API. 

I then produced some interactive prototypes to present to my PO. 

After presenting them to my PO the quick vs the more strategic solution was chosen. 

STEP 4

Feedback & Approval

I presented my design at Peer Review (our internal feedback session) where I was provided with UI feedback and after making the advised change I presented to my PO for approval.

Final design
THE SOLUTION

What I did

Post-launch the service attachment rate had already increased to 3.2%.

Final design
THE CHALLENGES

What I learned

The biggest challenge I faced was how to display the O-Team service to customers whose mental model was focused on purchasing a product. I noticed that initially there were too many decision points being presented to the customer increasing cognitive load and so simplifying them and also the interaction pattern would help. At the same time we had to provide enough relevant information to customers at the right time in their journey.